U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer would like some help from the Senate to move the House toward ratifying the new NAFTA, he said while speaking at the Senate Republicans' lunch about prospects for ratification and the work he's doing to get a trade deal done with Japan. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said Lighthizer told them to convince colleagues in the House to support it. "It was just cheerleading, 'rah, rah, sis boom bah,'" Kennedy complained. "I hope I'm wrong, but I don't understand why my colleagues think that Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi's going to agree to anything that will help the president. But I mean, I wish she would put the country first, but if you believe in watching what people do, not what they say, I'm not encouraged."
Section 232 Tariffs
The United States currently maintains a 25% tariff on steel imports and 10% on tariff on aluminum imports under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. In 2018, the Trump administration imposed Section 232 Tariffs on steel and aluminum imports into the United States, citing national security concerns. The U.S. agreed to lift tariffs on Canada and Mexico after the signing of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), and reached deals with the European Union, Japan and other countries to replace the tariffs with quotas for steel and aluminum imports into the U.S.
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for May 13-17 in case they were missed.
The Trump administration tried for months to insist that Mexico and Canada accept quotas on their steel and aluminum, and the fact that the administration lifted its tariffs on those metals on its NAFTA partners without any import restrictions shows "just how much the Administration has invested in passage of the USMCA," wrote Ted Murphy, managing partner of the Baker McKenzie office, in a blog post.
Importers of steel and aluminum from Canada and Mexico no longer need to report HTS numbers 9903.80.01 or 9903.85.01 now that the Section 232 tariffs have been lifted from Mexico and Canada, CBP said in a CSMS message. "Effective for goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on May 20, 2019, the Section 232 duty on imports of steel and aluminum articles with a country of origin of Canada or Mexico will no longer be in effect," the agency said. Steel importers should report the regular Chapter 72 or 73 subheadings, while aluminum importers should report the regular Chapter 76 numbers, CBP said. Both Canada and Mexico also annunced an end their retaliatory tariffs (see 1905200054).
The 25 percent Section 232 tariffs on Canadian steel and the 10 percent tariffs on aluminum will be removed within 48 hours, Canada and the U.S. said May 17. When the metals tariffs are removed, Canada will also roll back its retaliatory tariffs, which hit American metals and agriculture, as well as some prepared food. The joint statement said stricter customs enforcement to prevent transshipment will be coordinated between Canada and the U.S.
Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico are going away, the U.S. said May 17. They will be lifted from Canadian imports within 48 hours, but the Mexican government has not indicated timing for the relief there, and the Commerce Department did not respond to an inquiry by press time. Canada and Mexico will lift their retaliatory tariffs, which hit U.S. prepared food, agriculture and metals, at the same time the U.S. tariffs end.
Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland, speaking May 15 at the U.S. Capitol after meeting with the head of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Trade Subcommittee chairman, declined to predict when the U.S. and Canada might reach a resolution on Section 232 tariffs and Canada's retaliatory tariffs because of them. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testified earlier in the day in the Senate, and said there that "I think we’re close to an understanding with Mexico and Canada" on the tariffs.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, wants to get the new NAFTA ratified as soon as possible. He said that by holding back on sending an implementing bill for the revised deal, the White House is giving House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., an excuse to delay its consideration. Grassley said during a conference call with reporters on May 14 that the administration needs to "get Pelosi to talk about specifics and tell us exactly what she and the Democrats need to get it passed." He also said negotiations with Canada on lifting Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs seem to be advancing.
Trade Partnership Worldwide President Laura Baughman stands by her organization’s February survey report that found levying Section 301 tariffs on all remaining $300 billion in Chinese imports in addition to other sanctions in effect would cause severe U.S. economic harm, she said in an email. President Donald Trump's chief economic adviser Larry Kudlow, in a Fox News Sunday appearance May 12, called the study flawed. He tried to make the case that any economic "consequences" would be "modest" and well worth it.
House members that are leaders on trade, in the center and on the left, say that U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is recognizing the ways he's going to need to change the new NAFTA to get Democratic votes, but it's not yet clear how far he'll be willing or able to go. Wisconsin's Rep. Ron Kind, a New Democrat and free trader, said in a hallway interview with International Trade Today May 10, "We're kind of at an impasse. They keep telling us there's no way they can open this up and tweak it, and make this minor adjustment and we're saying ... we haven't met a trade agreement yet where members of Congress weren't allowed to get our fingerprints on it a little bit, massage it here and there for it to get to 218 [votes]. So, until somewhat blinks on that front ... ."