Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

T-Mobile faced tough questions Tuesday from a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on the carrier’s argument that states must align with the FCC’s revenue-based USF contribution mechanism. The court heard T-Mobile and subsidiaries’ challenge to a U.S. District Court for Northern California March 31 decision not to block the California Public Utilities Commission’s April 1 change to a connections-based method.

FCC Commissioner Nathan Simington sat down with Communications Daily last week to discuss his new role as a minority commissioner, the agency’s relationship with the NTIA, and his thoughts on proposals to reopen the record on virtual MVPDs and increase the agency’s collection of EEO information from broadcasters. Following are Simington's lightly edited responses.

Relative to the epic battles preceding the FCC’s last two votes on net neutrality rules, in 2015 and 2017, things have been relatively quiet on net neutrality since Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel announced she would seek a vote on an NPRM Oct. 19 (see 2309260047). There have statements for and against, but nothing compared with the fights of the past, industry observers told us.

A current revamp of Presidential Policy Directive 21 (PDD-21), which could mean outer space being declared critical infrastructure, is expected to be done by year's end, infrastructure policy experts told us. Proponents of such a designation say it would be a path to streamlined space industry rules, while critics warn of potentially more regulation. Asked whether it has discussed such a designation with the Department of Homeland Security, the FCC didn't comment.

The FTC proposed new rules for junk fees Wednesday in an effort to "eliminate these unfair and deceptive charges," said a news release. The agency would ban companies from advertising prices that "hide or leave out mandatory fees." Companies would also be banned from misrepresenting fees known as bogus fees. "By hiding the total price, these junk fees make it harder for consumers to shop for the best product or service and [they] punish businesses who are honest upfront," said Chair Lina Khan: "The FTC’s proposed rule to ban junk fees will save people money and time, and make our markets more fair and competitive.” The agency said the proposed rule would save consumers "more than 50 million hours per year" on "searching for the total price in live-ticketing and short-term lodging alone." The agency wants comments 60 days after Federal Register publication. At the FCC, Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel noted the commission's broadband consumer labels will "increase price transparency and reduce cost confusion." Consumers "deserve to know exactly what they are paying for when they sign up for communications services," Rosenworcel said. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce criticized the proposed rule. “Every minute of every day, Americans engage in close to 400,000 transactions, buying and selling goods and services," said Chief Policy Officer Neil Bradley: "It is baffling that the administration believes it is going to help consumers by regulating how businesses price all of those transactions."

CTA urged the FCC to base its proposed voluntary cybersecurity labeling program for smart devices on existing National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance, in comments posted Tuesday (see 2308100032). Other commenters urged the FCC to proceed with caution and involve industry in developing the program. Products would be labeled with the "U.S. Cyber Trust Mark" logo, for which the FCC is seeking registration from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Comments were due at the FCC Friday on an August NPRM (see 2307180054).

Reclassifying broadband as a Title II service would give the FCC more authority to do national security and public safety oversight, said a commission fact sheet released Thursday. "Currently, no federal agency can effectively monitor or address broadband outages that threaten jobs, education, and public safety," the release said, and "while the FCC has acted on a bipartisan basis to secure our communications networks against companies controlled by hostile foreign governments, the lack of specific authority over broadband leaves open a national security loophole." The proposal would allow the agency to require providers to report and fix internet outages as it does for voice services, ensure the FCC can "deny companies controlled by hostile foreign governments access to our broadband networks," and support ongoing efforts to enhance the resiliency of broadband networks. A USTelecom spokesperson said extending Title II to "critical issues involving national security and cybersecurity is proof positive that this is a major question that must be dealt with by Congress.” Former Commissioner Mike O’Rielly, meanwhile, sees the draft NPRM, released last week, as “mostly old rhetoric.” The commission “is just going through the motions via a retread of stale arguments and disproven claims, parts seem almost lazy and unthoughtful,” O’Rielly emailed: “I am somewhat surprised by the bizarre add of [Section] 214, which brings a world of unnecessary messiness, and privacy/security, [over] which the agency has no authority left. It may be just an NPRM but biting off those issues and others while not fully closing the door to rate regulation are substantive and tactical mistakes. Overall, the text doesn't fill in the intellectual missing pieces.”

President Joe Biden’s forthcoming executive order on AI will direct federal agencies like the FTC to explore existing authorities for ways to regulate the technology, NTIA Administrator Alan Davidson said Wednesday.

Commenters disagreed sharply on what the FCC should do in response to an August notice of inquiry on understanding nonfederal spectrum use. Some observers have questioned how much will be gained by the inquiry, especially because it doesn’t ask about federal use (see 2308020054). Comments were posted Wednesday in docket 23-232.

The FCC should reconsider proposed changes in an April NPRM on rules for Section 214 international authorizations (see 2304200039), CTIA and others said in reply comments, posted Tuesday in docket 23-119. The order authorized a one-time collection of foreign-ownership information from authorization holders and sought comment on rules requiring carriers to renew the authorizations every 10 years, “or in the alternative,” periodic updates. The FCC got pushback in the initial comment round but general support from DOJ, DOD and Department of Homeland Security, sometimes called Team Telecom (see 2309010058).