NAB and Xperi's proposal for higher digital FM power levels (see 2301130053) would lead to increased interference on the already burdened FM band, said New Jersey radio broadcaster Press Communications in an ex parte letter posted Friday in docket 22-405. “The public interest in this matter can best be served” by the FCC “doing nothing,” Press said. NAB and Xperi’s petition has gone through the public comment process, but the agency hasn’t otherwise acted on it. Through the waiver process, the FCC can authorize some changes in the proposal, Press said. “Blanket increases of digital signal levels” will “destroy long established and proven listening patterns to existing analog FM stations,” said Press: “This will be especially damning to lower power Class A broadcasters, AM operators with FM translators” and low-power FMs. The FCC should instead look to help Class A FM and AM stations, or exempt the crowded FM band in New Jersey from the rule, Press said. The broadcaster condemned the increasing use of FM translators by HD radio stations, and said the impact of the proposal on AM stations using FM translators should have been studied. Press said: “Contrary to what the Petitioners would like everyone to believe, in a situation where the FM band has already been overwhelmed and saturated with additional services, there is no such thing as benign added interference.”

The Standard General/Tegna broadcasters’ filings urging an FCC vote on the deal blatantly disregard all the procedural boundaries in the agency’s rules and should be stricken from the record, said the Enforcement Bureau Thursday and Friday in a motion to strike, a motion opposing the broadcaster waiver request, and a filing on confidential documents in docket 22-162. The filings raise similar arguments to those made by unions last week (see 2303220072). Broadcast industry officials told us they don’t expect the FCC take up the broadcaster appeal, and court filings are likely this week. Though the FCC administrative law judge’s decision on a motion to certify is unappealable according to agency rules, the broadcasters asked the FCC to “simply conclude that this rule does not apply to them,” the EB said Thursday. The broadcaster insistence the FCC must rule on the deal by Monday or face a court challenge isn’t backed up by precedent and would deny other parties in the proceeding due process by not allowing them time for a response, the EB said. “It is striking that, after complaining the Commission has denied them due process, Applicants seem to have no issue with denying due process to the other parties named in the hearing,” the EB filings said. The broadcaster application for review should also be rejected because it ignored the five-page limit on such documents specifically laid out in the regulations, the EB said. The broadcasters asked for a waiver of that requirement, then filed their 25-page AFR. “There is nothing in the Rules that legitimizes a pleading that exceeds the page limits simply because a party has requested a waiver of that limit,” the EB said. The bureau also took issue with Standard’s request the FCC not share confidential filings in the proceeding with new attorneys for Communications Workers of America's NewsGuild and the National Association of Broadcast Engineers and Technicians sectors. Both Standard’s request to block the document sharing and the attorney requests for access were premature, the EB said. Standard is incorrect in its arguments access isn’t needed because the hearing is likely to be either blocked by legal action or mooted when the deal collapses, said the bureau. The “mere filing” of pleadings with the FCC or courts “does not suspend the hearing proceeding,” the EB said. “The obligations of any of the parties -- including Applicants -- to participate in that proceeding remain on-going.” Standard didn’t comment.

Possible FCC action on a Florida Association of Broadcasters petition on lowest unit rate advertisements could lead to an increase in political ads, said Wilkinson Barker broadcast attorney David Oxenford in a blog post Wednesday. The Florida broadcasters asked the agency for a declaratory ruling on whether political committees authorized by a political candidate are entitled to lowest unit ad rates, as the candidates themselves are. “This is a very confusing area of the law and, if not interpreted narrowly, could open the door to LUR overwhelming the current political advertising landscape,” Oxenford said. FAB asked the FCC to use Federal Election Campaign Act definition of such committees, which requires them to be affiliated with a single candidate and receive contributions on behalf of that candidate. However, the rules for coordination between candidates and other groups are looser in many states, and that could have consequences depending on what the FCC does in response to the FAB request, Oxenford said. The FCC “has not yet officially indicated that it will ask for public comment on this petition,” he said.

An FCC task force on ATSC 3.0 should include a recommitment to using the standard to provide advanced emergency information, said Advanced Warning and Response Network (AWARN) Alliance Executive Director John Lawson in a meeting with an aide to Commissioner Brendan Carr Monday, according to an ex parte filing in docket 15-94. The task force effort should also involve an external stakeholder dialogue on creating a voluntary industry plan to improve alerting, Lawson said. Lawson is a partner in a company working to produce alert-enabled set-top boxes and dongles, and the filing said the task force should also look into options for federal support of such devices. “These devices, working in tandem with broadcast stations, which have back-up generators and days of fuel, will be a lifeline for those impacted by disasters when cellular networks and/or the electric grid go down,” said the filing.

The FCC should strike the Standard/Tegna application for review for being procedurally improper and add “abuse of process” to the matters being considered in the deal’s hearing proceeding, said the Communications Workers of America's NewsGuild and National Association of Broadcast Engineers and Technicians sectors in a motion filed Wednesday (see 2303210049). “Applicants are attempting to bully the Commission into jettisoning its process and granting their Applications without due consideration or resolution of substantial and material questions of fact,” said the motion. FCC precedent puts a “heavy burden” on parties seeking waivers of the rules, and the broadcasters haven’t met that standard, the motion said. “Their self-imposed deadline by no means justifies the radical departure from the orderly Commission process Applicants demand,” the filing says. The broadcasters’ warnings about a possible court battle leading to the FCC’s ALJ being ruled unconstitutional is an empty threat, because FCC rules allow hearing proceedings to be conducted by the commission itself or one or more commissioners, the motion said (see 2009140063). The FCC was right to block the deal because Standard’s Managing Partner Soohyung Kim has a history of “gutting” companies, the motion said, citing Radio Shack, American Apparel and other companies involved with Standard and Kim as evidence. Tegna raised similar arguments against Kim and Standard during multiple unsuccessful proxy fights (see 2105060069) over the makeup of Tegna’s board. Standard cited its history of increased staffing at its broadcast stations and repeatedly promised not to cut jobs at Tegna in past filings. The company is a turnaround investor that seeks to improve failing companies, a person close to Standard told us. Standard declined to comment on Wednesday’s motion, but in a Newsweek opinion piece that day, Kim said the FCC Media Bureau is arbitrarily defining the public interest and “effectively made itself judge and jury.” “How confident can anyone be that other agencies won't similarly find ways to interfere in their respective markets?” Kim wrote. If the FCC commissioners aren’t given the chance to vote on the deal, “no one can say they weren't warned when another bureaucracy in this or a future administration breaks with its precedents to grab unaccountable power when and where it can,” he said. The FCC didn’t comment.

The FCC shouldn't grant access to confidential information in the Standard/Tegna proceeding to additional attorneys representing the Communications Workers of America's NewsGuild and National Association of Broadcast Engineers and Technicians sectors, said the two companies and Cox Media Group in a joint filing posted in docket 22-162 Tuesday. Standard extended until April 4 the expiration dates of its tender offers to buy Tegna shareholders’ stock, said a news release Monday. The tender offer was to expire Tuesday. The broadcasters in the Standard/Tegna deal previously accused the unions’ attorneys of mishandling confidential information (see 2301230063). “There is no reason” for attorneys Arthur Belendiuk and Kenneth Levy to be granted access to highly confidential information because the administrative law judge hearing will be invalidated by an FCC vote or canceled when the deal collapses, the broadcasters said. Not giving them access won’t hurt their case because the FCC’s ALJ hasn’t issued a scheduling order, the broadcasters said. “In the unlikely event that some circumstance emerges where Belendiuk and Levy would have a legitimate reason to review Applicants’ CI and HCI, the Commission could revisit the request at that time. At present, there is none.” The unions’ attorneys declined to comment. In a letter posted Tuesday, the Korean American Association of Greater New York, the Council of Korean Americans and other Korean-American groups objected to the FCC’s handling of the Standard/Tegna deal. “We take issue with the implication that ownership of a major media outlet such as TEGNA by an Asian American does not advance the goals of diversity,” said the letter. “We believe that the merger would promote diversity and we believe that the merger will be a buffer against antiAsian bias, xenophobia, and racism.”

There has been some positive movement in talks on a treaty updating broadcasting protections, a World Intellectual Property Organization official told us Tuesday. At the end of the March 13-17 meeting of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, however, several observers cited continuing unresolved key issues and not much progress (see 2303170003). But Copyright Law Division Director Michele Woods noted the secretariat is in the hands of the member states and is ready to support their efforts to reduce their differences. Based on their statements, the talks "progressed in terms of refining the compromise text that many delegations said could serve as the basis for moving forward," and while acknowledging the work that remains to be done, many "reiterated that they want the treaty to move forward." Woods said the document under discussion at the meeting is a compromise in the sense it would grant exclusive rights at some level (fixation), while also giving governments the possibility of implementing the treaty obligations through other adequate and effective legal means. Previous drafts had always contained alternative proposals, but "this time we heard multiple statements suggesting that the compromise is a good basis to move forward." A committee chair's summary noted delegations had different views on whether the treaty should offer some minimum level of protection for broadcasting over computer networks. Asked whether the issue of including webcasting in the treaty had long since been settled (the consensus was not to), Woods said the question of broadcasting over computer networks may be a similar issue, but the choice of terminology is significant. According to the explanation from the drafters, the term "computer networks" was used in an effort to be technology neutral and future-proof, she said: At the same time, the discussion and positions of various delegations have changed over time as the broadcasting industry has evolved.

Andrew Schwartzman is senior counselor for the Benton Institute for Broadband & Society (see 2303090064)

A conservative watchdog group that opposed the nomination of Gigi Sohn to the FCC is seeking information on “partisan political influences” on the agency over the Standard/Tegna deal, said a news release Thursday. The American Accountability Foundation (AAF) filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking records of communications between FCC Media Bureau Chief Holly Saurer and deal opponents such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Andrew Schwartzman, Benton Foundation Institute for Broadband and Society senior counselor, who represents unions in the proceeding. “Let’s hope our nation’s television airwaves aren’t for sale to politically connected media moguls and disingenuous lawyers who failed to disclose multiple conflicts of interest,” said AAF President Tom Jones in the release. AAF opposed several nominations by President Joe Biden, and paid for a billboard in Las Vegas opposing Sohn, who withdrew from the nomination process this week. The FCC didn’t comment.

The FCC should continue to make progress on ATSC 3.0, support AM radio, and relax broadcast ownership rules, the Florida Association of Broadcasters said in ex parte calls with FCC Commissioners Brendan Carr and Nathan Simington March 1, according to nearly identical ex parte filings in docket 22-459. “Protecting and revitalizing the AM band serves the public interest by maintaining the public safety, news, and entertainment content provided by AM stations,” the filings said. “Ensuring the industry remains economically viable will allow broadcasters to continue serving the public interest by delivering local news, public safety information, and entertainment to their audiences.”