Efforts by major internet players to remove illegal online hate speech won high marks from the European Commission Monday. Dailymotion, Google Plus, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, jeuxvideos.com, Microsoft, Snapchat and Twitter agreed to be bound by a 2016 code of conduct aimed at stopping proliferation of racist and xenophobic hate speech online, the EC said. EU law defines illegal hate speech as public incitement to violence or hatred directed to groups or individuals on the basis of characteristics such as race, color, religion, or national origin. Companies must review such content within 24 hours of being notified and remove it if necessary, while respecting the right of freedom of speech. The EC's latest review found that around 89 percent of notifications are assessed within 24 hours. On average, the companies are taking down nearly 72 percent of hate speech notified to them, and they're consistently and scrupulously gauging whether content falls within that category, it said. One area needs more work, the report found: information users are given on what happens to their notices of illegal hate speech. Facebook is "the only platform that provides systematic feedback to all users while the other platforms do not yet reach these levels," it said. Twitter is reviewing 88 percent of all notifications within 24 hours, emailed Director-Public Policy for Europe Karen White: The company has boosted its safety policies, tightened reporting systems and "introduced over 70 changes to improve conversational health." Twitter is "doing this with a sense of urgency," she added. "There is always more we can do to tackle hate speech." Facebook and Instagram are "delighted" to be part of the code of conduct, a Facebook spokesperson emailed.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center sued Customs and Border Protection Friday for audit records on electronic device border searches. The lawsuit follows EPIC’s Freedom of Information Act request, filed about two months ago, seeking records to determine the legality of border searches of cellphones, tablets and laptops. The group cited a January 2018 CBP directive requiring agency audits of border searches. CBP failed to make a timely decision on the FOIA request, said the suit in U.S. District Court in Washington. The agency didn’t comment.

CTA agrees with the Congressional Budget Office “assessment” that tariffs on Chinese imports are taxes on U.S. consumers and businesses, but CBO underestimated damage the higher duties will inflict on the tech sector and U.S. economy, emailed Sage Chandler, vice president-international trade policy. CBO estimated the higher import tariffs will reduce U.S. GDP by roughly 0.1 percent yearly through 2029 (see 1901290001). “The U.S. tech industry alone is paying $1 billion a month on tariffs,” said Chandler Tuesday. “Potential short- and mid-term impact of tariffs could be more destabilizing than indicated by CBO’s analysis. Not only do tariffs increase costs for American business and slow U.S. economic growth, real potential exists -- and warning signs are already evident -- that destabilizing global supply chains may have detrimental effects that spill in to global equity markets.” CBO didn’t comment Wednesday.

The ICANN board approved for another 90 days a temporary generic top-level domain specification for handling the personal data of domain name registrants under the EU's general data protection regulation, the organization said. The gTLD temporary spec was approved in May and reaffirmed about every three months after. It sets interim requirements for complying "with existing ICANN contractual requirements and community-developed policies" for GDPR, noted an ICANN email. The board can continue renewals for a year. Earlier Wednesday, a Brussels conference heard about non-domain name GDPR challenges and hopes (see 1901300007). An ICANN committee developing policy for GDPR compliance expects its final report in early February (see 1901250003).

China is “highly concerned” about DOJ’s 13-count indictment against Huawei and Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou on bank fraud, obstruction of justice and other allegations (see 1901280052), said a Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tuesday. Meanwhile, legislators ramped up scrutiny. The U.S. uses its “national power” to “tarnish and crack down on specific Chinese companies in an attempt to strangle their lawful and legitimate operations,” said China's spokesperson. “Behind such practices are deep political intentions and manipulations.” In detaining Meng in Vancouver in early December, the U.S. and Canada “abused their bilateral extradition agreement and took compulsory measures against a Chinese citizen for no reason,” the spokesperson said. The U.S. should “immediately withdraw” Meng’s arrest warrant, “refrain from making a formal extradition request, and stop going further down the wrong path,” he said. Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., pressed national security officials during Tuesday's Senate Armed Services Committee hearing about Huawei and ZTE's national security threat. Wicker earlier praised the indictments. Commerce is “taking a hard look" at Huawei given its “activities and impact on developing technologies, such as 5G and autonomous vehicles, as well as network security and consumer data protection,” he said. Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., welcomed the indictments, “which detail the company’s brazen efforts to steal corporate trade secrets, commit fraud, and obstruct justice.” Vice Chairman Mark Warner, D-Va., said it's a “reminder that we need to take seriously the risks of doing business with companies like Huawei and allowing them access to our markets, and I will continue to strongly urge our ally Canada to reconsider Huawei’s inclusion in any aspect of its 5G infrastructure.” Commerce Security Subcommittee Chairman Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, tweeted the indictments show "just one more example of Chinese businesses unwilling to play by the rules." The panel "will be conducting serious oversight of these Chinese threats to the U.S. economy," he said.

China’s 2018 “digital protectionism and mercantilist” policies ranked among the worst for the sixth straight year, “undermining trade and competition in key tech sectors,” warned an Information Technology and Innovation Foundation annual report Monday. “While these forms of protectionism typically rely on behind-the-border regulations rather than tariffs to protect local firms, the objective and impact remain the same -- either to replace foreign goods and services with local ones, or to unfairly promote exports, or both.” Among China’s worst 2018 infractions was a new “standardization law” that shuns international principles and best practices and “could be used to favor local tech firms,” ITIF said. New rules could “potentially force firms to store data only in China if it is related to privately funded, commercially focused research,” it said. China’s refusal to reference its World Trade Organization commitments in the standardization law “raised further concerns about potential discriminatory intentions,” said ITIF. “Unique levels of standards,” combined with lack of transparency about implementation and enforcement “adds further uncertainty for foreign firms” there, it said. “Such nontransparent and discriminatory standards can act as a significant barrier to trade, especially for high-tech.”

The EU general data protection regulation is showing good results in the eight months it has been in effect, the European Commission said Friday. People "have become more conscious of the importance of data protection and of their rights" and are now exercising those rights, it said. National privacy authorities have received over 95,000 complaints, the most common of which involve telemarketing, promotional emails and video surveillance/closed caption TV. High-level cases could lead to fines up to 4 percent of the annual revenue of a company, the EC said. Three fines have been issued, the largest by France against Google for 50 million euros (about $57 million) for lack of consent to Google Ads (see 1901220030). The EC urged the five countries that haven't adopted the GDPR into national law to do so quickly.

Dozens of global tech groups want “rapid action” on the World Trade Organization’s “ambitious” trade-related e-commerce “framework,” they said in an open letter Friday to WTO trade ministers. Seventy-six ministers signed a statement Friday vowing to start WTO negotiations on trade-related aspects of e-commerce aimed at achieving “a high standard outcome that builds on existing WTO agreements,” with participation of as many members as possible. “The ability of businesses and individuals to participate effectively in the global economy today requires a modern e-commerce framework that facilitates customs clearance, digital transactions, transparency, trust, movement of information, and access to a variety of e-commerce platforms, payments technologies, communications, social media and marketing tools, productivity software, and shipping and logistics services,” said the letter, whose signers included BSA|The Software Alliance, CTA, CompTIA, the Information Technology Industry Council and Internet Association. “Improving the enabling environment for digital trade and global e-commerce is particularly critical for micro, small and early-stage businesses.”

U.S. efforts on Privacy Shield are welcome, but the EU still has concerns, the European Data Protection Board said Thursday after EDPB's Tuesday-Wednesday meeting. Among positive steps are changes to the initial certification process, own-initiative oversight and enforcement actions, publication of key documents such as decisions by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court, appointment of new members to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board and the appointment of a permanent ombudsman. President Donald Trump Jan. 18 nominated Keith Krach undersecretary of state for growth, energy and the environment (see 1901230051). EDPB said remaining issues include a "lack of concrete assurances" about indiscriminate collection and access of personal data for national security purposes, and questions whether the ombudsman has sufficient powers to remedy noncompliance with the trans-Atlantic data transfer regime. EDPB said checks for compliance with PS principles aren't strong enough. A December European Commission review found many improvements but warned the agreement could be shut down if no permanent ombudsman is in place by Feb. 28 (see 1812190002). The Computer & Communications Industry Association on Thursday urged the Senate to "expedite confirming the ombudsman."

Digital trade-related businesses make up more than $460 billion in U.S. exports and add 1.5 million jobs to the economy annually, the Internet Association said Wednesday.