ISPs told the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in two cases overturning the Chevron doctrine means the FCC’s net neutrality order must be stayed pending judicial review (see 2407010036). The FCC said Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and the other case had no implications for its order, which reclassified broadband as a Title II service under the Communications Act.

Sustaining broadband networks is a “paramount objective” of the Nebraska Universal Service Fund (NUSF) high-cost program, especially with the "influx of federal and state deployment funding," the Nebraska Public Service Commission decided in a Tuesday order. Commissioners voted unanimously Tuesday for two orders on state USF changes (docket NUSF-139) and to consider sanctions against Windstream for three separate 911 outages (docket 911-076).

FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel showed no willingness Tuesday to abandon a March Further NPRM that would ban bulk billing arrangements between ISPs and multi-dwelling unit owners (see 2403050069) despite bipartisan criticism during a House Communications Subcommittee hearing. She was similarly unmoved by GOP skepticism about a proposal requiring disclosure of AI-generated content in political ads (see 2405220061). During the hearing, Republican Commissioner Brendan Carr called for the FCC to backtrack on both proposals because of the U.S. Supreme Court’s June Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo decision and other rulings (see 2407080039).

House Republicans’ proposal that reduces the FTC’s budget 9% would create an “extraordinarily dire” situation at the agency and result in furloughs, Chair Lina Khan told House Commerce Committee members during a budget hearing Tuesday.

The FCC received unanimous support from commenters that have filed so far for an NTIA proposal that calls for using geofencing to allow higher equivalent isotropically radiated power limits for cellular vehicle-to-everything on-board units in the 5.9 GHz band (see 2406100032). Comments were posted on Friday and Monday (docket 19-138).

Paramount Global's pending deal with studio Skydance Media shouldn't face notable objections from the FCC or DOJ, we are told. The $8 billion agreement sees Skydance founder-CEO David Ellison and his family, along with private equity firm RedBird Capital, buying National Amusements Inc., which has a controlling stake in Paramount. The Skydance investor group would then combine Skydance with Paramount. The transaction includes a $1.5 billion infusion into Paramount to reduce debt and for strategic initiatives. Paramount said it expects to close the deal by Sept. 30, 2025.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s June decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo that overruled the Chevron doctrine (see 2407010036) will likely heavily influence discussion during a House Communications Subcommittee hearing Tuesday on the commission’s FY 2025 funding request, congressional aides and lobbyists told us. Chevron gave the FCC and other federal agencies deference in interpreting federal laws. Republican FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is urging the commission ahead of the House hearing to drop a planned July 18 vote on a draft order and Further NPRM letting schools and libraries use E-rate support for off-premises Wi-Fi hot spots in response to the ruling. The hearing will begin at 10 a.m. in 2123 Rayburn.

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) explicitly requires that the FCC "regulate to achieve equal access to broadband" and "authorizes [the] FCC's disparate-impact rules," a consumer advocacy groups said in a joint filing Friday at the 8th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court (see 2401300089). In addition, the groups argued that the major questions doctrine didn't apply in this case.

European Commission proposals for addressing the continent's digital infrastructure needs include some worrying aspects and have kept alive the long-running "fair share" dispute, some commenters said. While no plan forces content providers to pay telcos for use of their networks, most U.S. entities that responded to an EU white paper focused on that issue, telecom consultant Innocenzo Genna said in an email. The white paper, which prompted more than 350 responses (available at the link), also unnerved EU telecom and spectrum regulators.

A U.S. District Court decision dismissing an industry challenge of a Maryland digital ad tax Wednesday relied in part on the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Moody v. Netchoice that was issued just two days before the district court opinion was released (see 2407010053). Moreover, the cases involved many of the same parties. Plaintiffs in U.S. Chamber v. Lierman -- including CCIA and Netchoice -- didn’t say whether they would appeal, but previously they appealed two district court holdings in the case. “CCIA remains committed to ensuring that protected speech is not burdened, directly or indirectly, by governmental intrusion,” CCIA Senior Vice President Stephanie Joyce said in an email. “We will hold to that commitment as we evaluate the district court’s decision to dismiss our claim in Lierman that Maryland’s Digital Advertising Gross Revenues Tax Act impermissibly burdens online speech.”