CTIA still disagrees with a Kentucky 911 law that was upheld in court Friday, the wireless industry association said Tuesday. The U.S. District Court for Eastern Kentucky ruled that federal law doesn’t preempt the state from requiring Lifeline providers to directly pay state 911 fees. Kentucky’s policy is constitutional and doesn’t frustrate Congress’ universal service objectives, the court said.

Since AT&T announced Saturday that “data-specific fields” were part of a data set involving 7.6 million current and 65.4 million former customers released on the dark web March 16, nine negligence class actions have been filed in U.S. District Court for Northern Texas in Dallas, including five by Kendall Law.

The U.S. District Court for Virginia’s Oct. 26 ruling dismissing Hanan Elatr Khashoggi’s privacy case against NSO Group Technologies and Q Cyber Technologies for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction was “in error,” said Khashoggi's opening brief (docket 23-2234) in the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Monday.

Three tracking pixels on the Reuters website collect visitors' IP addresses in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, alleged a class action Monday (docket 1:24-cv-02466) in U.S. District Court for Southern New York in Manhattan.

The personally identifiable information (PII) of some 7.6 million current and 65.4 million former AT&T customers was compromised in a data breach last month due to the carrier's failure to implement "adequate and reasonable" cybersecurity "procedures and protocols,” a negligence class action alleged Saturday (docket 3:24-cv-00757) in U.S. District Court for Northern Texas in Dallas. It was one of at least eight filed over the breach in the Texas court since Saturday.

Communications Litigation Today is tracking the below lawsuits involving appeals of FCC actions. Cases marked with an * were terminated since the last update. Cases in bold are new since the last update.

The U.S. Supreme Court docketed as case number 23-1062 the cert petition of three former Twitter users. The petitioners are seeking review of the 6th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court’s judgment affirming that they lacked Article III standing to bring First Amendment social media censorship claims against the Department of Health and Human Services, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra (see 2403270011), said a text-only docket entry Friday.

American Express aided and “conspired with” Facebook to intercept communications sent and received by customers in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, alleged a class action Friday (docket 1:24-cv-02408) in U.S. District Court for Southern New York in Manhattan.

An organization’s information security team, led by its chief information security officer, “stands on the front lines against cyberattacks,” said roughly four dozen current and former CISOs in an amicus brief Friday (docket 1:23-cv-09518) at the U.S. District Court for Southern New York in Manhattan in support of SolarWinds’ motion to dismiss the SEC’s amended securities fraud complaint (see 2403250039).

Expect the U.S. Supreme Court to support the White House and reject Missouri’s First Amendment challenge claiming administration officials colluded with Big Tech to censor COVID-19 content, legal experts said in interviews last week. Others in the case were less certain, saying the high court provided mixed signals during March 18 oral argument in Murthy v. Missouri (docket 23-411) (see 2403180051).