The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctioned six Nigerian nationals who allegedly ran an email scheme to steal more than $6 million from U.S. companies and people, Treasury said June 16. The Nigerian nationals impersonated business executives and “engaged in romance fraud” -- in which they “masqueraded as affectionate partners to gain trust from victims” -- to receive wire transfers, Treasury said. The sanctions target Richard Uzuh, Micheal Olorunyomi, Alex Ogunshakin, Felix Okpoh, Nnamdi Benson and Abiola Kayode.

A new Russian law giving that country's courts “exclusive” jurisdiction over disputes involving sanctioned entities could affect “a lot” of business deals, a June 12 Baker McKenzie post said. The law, effective June 19, will give Russian commercial courts jurisdiction over disputes “directly or indirectly” involving sanctioned entities that “fall within the scope of Russian legislation,” the post said, including if one of the parties “cannot get access to justice [outside of Russia] because of sanctions.” Baker McKenzie advises companies to review their dispute resolution mechanism in contracts with Russian parties and to double-check the ownership structure of Russia-related business partners.

The Law Society of England and Wales recently issued guidance on working with clients on sanctions lists, a June 12 EU Sanctions blog post said. Attorneys should first ensure they do not have a “false-positive identification” and work to confirm their client is on a sanctions list, the society said. If the client is confirmed to be subject to sanctions, “suspend the transaction” and report it to the government or a money laundering compliance officer, the society said. Attorneys are required to “report sanctions-related information” to the United Kingdom’s Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation, the guidance said: not doing so could lead to a penalty or criminal prosecution. Licenses may be available in certain situations, it added.

Sudan urged the U.N. Security Council to lift sanctions on the country, saying current sanctions are worsening the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, a June 9 news release said. At the very least, the U.N. should establish “clear, well-identified and measurable benchmarks” for lifting the sanctions, a Sudan representative said. U.N. officials said the country is still marred by violence and sanctions are justified. “It is not to punish Sudan, but to support and achieve sustainable peace,” the Sudan Sanctions Committee chair, Estonian ambassador to the U.N. Sven Jurgenson, said in a report to the Security Council.

The International Criminal Court criticized a U.S. executive order that authorized sanctions against the ICC (see 2006110028), calling the order an “unacceptable attempt to interfere with the rule of law” and saying it feels “profound regret” at the U.S.’s decision. “The ICC stands firmly by its staff and officials,” it said June 11, adding that the sanctions are aimed at “influencing the actions of ICC officials in the context of the Court's independent and objective investigations and impartial judicial proceedings.” President of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute O-Gon Kwon called the sanctions “unprecedented.”

The U.S. will continue to authorize sanctions against Belarus officials and others for undermining the country’s democratic processes, the White House said June 11. The authorization, introduced in 2006, will remain in effect for at least one more year beyond the expiration date of June 16, 2020. The sanctions block property and freeze assets of designated people or companies.

The State Department officially updated its Cuba Restricted List with entities that support the Castro regime (see 2006040014), a notice said. Entries on the list are generally blocked from completing U.S. financial transactions and will not be eligible for U.S. export licenses. The changes take effect June 12.

The International Chamber of Commerce recently issued an addendum to its guidance on the use of sanctions clauses, urging banks to refrain from using or accepting sanctions clauses that impose extra restrictions on a deal. Broad sanctions clauses “defeat the independence principle in letters of credit and demand guarantees, the exclusively documentary nature of the instrument, and create uncertainty,” the ICC said in the May addendum.

Oil tankers are steering clear of Venezuelan waters as the industry braces for a host of U.S. sanctions on ships operating in the Venezuelan oil sector, according to a June 9 Reuters report. Reuters previously reported the U.S. is preparing sanctions on dozens of foreign oil tankers for doing business with Venezuela, which could include designations on at least 40 ships. The move could lead to sharp increases in tanker rates and disrupt the global shipping industry, Reuters said.

The U.S. officially designated the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and its Shanghai-based subsidiary, E-Sail Shipping Company Ltd., a June 8 State Department news release said. State in December announced its intention to sanction both IRISL and E-Sail (see 1912120024), but the agency said it postponed those designations for six months to allow exporters of humanitarian goods to find alternative shipping methods when exporting to Iran. “Now that this generous delay has come to an end, those in the commercial and maritime industries doing business with Iran must use carriers or shipping methods other than IRISL or E-Sail,” State said.