The U.S. Chamber of Commerce will support the new NAFTA, and will lobby for its passage, the group announced Dec. 10. CEO Thomas J. Donohue wrote that the group will be working to resolve a handful of outstanding issues, but only specifically mentioned the Section 232 tariffs on Mexican and Canadian steel and aluminum. He spent far more time scolding President Donald Trump for his intention to terminate NAFTA "in order to present the incoming Congress with a choice between the new agreement and no agreement. We disagree with this strategy." Donohue wrote, "Issuing this threat against a co-equal branch of government is neither necessary nor productive and could actually cost votes." A prominent free-trade Democrat in the House of Representatives made the same point on Dec. 10 (see 1812100024).
Mara Lee
Mara Lee, Senior Editor, is a reporter for International Trade Today and its sister publications Export Compliance Daily and Trade Law Daily. She joined the Warren Communications News staff in early 2018, after covering health policy, Midwestern Congressional delegations, and the Connecticut economy, insurance and manufacturing sectors for the Hartford Courant, the nation’s oldest continuously published newspaper (established 1674). Before arriving in Washington D.C. to cover Congress in 2005, she worked in Ohio, where she witnessed fervent presidential campaigning every four years.
Agriculture interests, including meat, wheat and grape growers, told the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative that they will lose market share to competitors in Australia, Europe, Canada, Mexico and Chile as those countries begin to benefit from the Trans-Pacific Partnership and EU-Japan free trade agreement. As they testified Dec. 10 on negotiating a U.S.-Japan agreement, they said speed is of the essence.
Importers paid more than $6 billion total in tariffs in October, the first full month that there were additional tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods, according to an analysis from Tariffs Hurt the Heartland. The group said that amount -- which is $3.1 billion more than was paid in October 2017 -- has not slowed imports on the tariffed goods, but has drastically cut exports that are subject to retaliatory tariffs. The group is funded in part by farm interests, who have been particularly hard-hit by retaliation. Their Dec. 7 release said that imports subject to new tariffs declined 0.6 percent in October, while exports targeted for retaliation fell 37 percent. About two-thirds of the increase is for Section 301 tariffs, while steel and aluminum tariffs cost an additional $446 million. The goods on the Section 301 list would have cost $394 million in tariffs before the action; in October, tariffs on those imports were $2.6 billion. CBP recently said it has assessed more than $10 billion under the recent Trump administration Section 201, 232 and 301 trade remedies (see 1811260010).
Increased material costs was the top cost pressure for 20 percent of CEOs surveyed by the Business Roundtable, and that group's leader said tariffs are the reason why. Only labor costs was mentioned by more CEOs. Business Roundtable CEO Josh Bolten said that while the survey, released Dec. 7, didn't ask which set of tariffs is the problem, he's hearing from companies that metals tariffs are a bigger burden than the Section 301 tariffs. That's because a relatively small amount of production uses inputs from lists one and two of Chinese imports, and steel is used in many sectors. "The ones that have gotten the biggest public attention are the auto manufacturers," he said, "but really it's across the membership."
The United Automobile Workers union would like to see vehicles left out of trade negotiations entirely when Japan and the U.S. sit down to craft a free-trade deal. Josh Nassar, UAW legislative director, told the International Trade Commission that Japan has no tariffs on imported cars, yet its imports are just 7 percent of sales. From all countries, Japan imported 11.1 billion in vehicles in 2017, according to World's Top Exports. In 2017, the Commerce Department said the U.S. imported $51 billion in Japanese-built vehicles. The ITC also heard from the milk lobby, the American Chemistry Council and the American Apparel and Footwear Association during its hearing Dec. 6.
The National Council of Textile Organizations announced Dec. 6 that it endorses the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, and will lobby for it. The organization said the U.S. exported $11.8 billion in textiles within the NAFTA region in 2017. The trade group views USMCA as an improvement on NAFTA because the rewrite has stronger rules of origin for sewing thread, pocketing, narrow elastics and some coated fabrics; it has stronger customs enforcement rules; and it closes what NCTO calls the Kissell Amendment loophole. The Kissell Amendment, which covers Department of Homeland Security uniform and body armor purchases, allows sourcing from NAFTA partners, not just American producers. According to a 2017 GAO report, 58 percent of DHS spending on uniform body armor procurement is for imported items. If USMCA becomes law, apparel purchased for the agency will have to be sewn in the U.S., an NCTO spokesman said. He said the change affects "more than $30 million worth of contracts on an annual basis."
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced Dec. 6 that the government of Morocco will allow U.S. beef imports. Morocco opened its market to U.S. poultry in August. USTR estimated Morocco could buy $80 million a year in beef from the U.S. Details on the beef export requirements are on the FDA website.
A withdrawal of the U.S. from NAFTA by President Donald Trump could help push the new NAFTA through Congress, according to Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Iowa Republican who will take over the Senate Finance Committee next year. Grassley, who was speaking on an agriculture radio program on Dec. 3, also praised the president's approach to trade more broadly.
President Donald Trump sounded more positive about the possibilities of ending the trade war with China after his morning tweets on Dec. 4 may have fueled a stock market sell-off. Trump, who had boasted about tariffs making America rich (see 1812040015), tweeted later that night: "Ultimately, I believe, we will be making a deal -- either now or into the future.... China does not want Tariffs!"
The World Trade Organization's dispute settlement body agreed to set up two more panels to judge whether the U.S. was justified in levying aluminum and steel tariffs on trading partners under a national security rationale. The decision, made Dec. 4, added Switzerland and India to the list of eight countries and the European Union that will have panels challenge the tariffs (see 1811210029).