CAFC Issues Mandate Denying US Steel Companies' Bid to Intervene in Section 232 Exclusion Cases

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its mandate Jan. 4 in a case denying a group of U.S. steel companies the right to intervene in a series of cases challenging denied exclusion requests for Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs. The mandate comes after the court denied the steel companies' rehearing bid over the decision (see 2212280017). In the case, the Court of International Trade and later the Federal Circuit said that a proposed intervenor must have a legally protectable interest in the transaction at issue, have a direct relationship with the litigation where the intervenor will either gain or lose by the direct judgment, or show its interests are not adequately expressed by the government. The courts ruled the steel companies failed on all three fronts.

(California Steel Industries v. U.S., Fed. Cir. # 21-2172) (North American Interpipe v. U.S., Fed. Cir. # 21-2180) (Evraz v. U.S., Fed Cir. # 21-2181) (AM/NS Calvert v. U.S., Fed. Cir. # 21-2182) (Valbruna Slater Stainless v. U.S., Fed. Cir. # 21-2183) (Voestalpine High Performance Metals v. U.S., Fed. Cir. # 21-2185)