PCLOB Chair Agrees Congress Should Apply Carpenter Decision to Other Data

Congress doesn’t have to wait to apply different protective thresholds to sensitive information in light of the Supreme Court’s Carpenter decision (see 2005130056), said Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board Chairman Adam Klein Wednesday during a PCLOB virtual forum. Carpenter said the government’s collection of at least seven days of cellsite location information is a Fourth Amendment-protected search, meaning police must obtain warrants. Klein agreed with Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty & National Security Program. Goitein said Carpenter indicates Congress can apply that standard to other information collected under Section 215 of the Patriot Act. For instance, authorities can collect web browsing data without warrant using Section 215. Goitein said that’s one area Congress could legislate. The Senate recently rejected such a proposal (see 2005130056). PCLOB members Edward Felten, Jane Nitze, Travis LeBlanc and Aditya Bamzai asked how the board can better fulfill its mission and what authorities it should be scrutinizing. It could explore Section 215 to determine what intelligence value it's yielding, said University of Texas School of Law Associate Dean-Academic Affairs Robert Chesney. Goitein agreed Section 215 needs attention but disagreed the PCLOB should weigh intelligence value. The board’s focus is privacy and civil liberties so that should be the focus of any Section 215 review, she added. Nitze asked if the existence of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court lessens the incentive for congressional oversight of intelligence agencies. Goitein agreed but said removing the FISA court isn’t the answer. Bamzai asked what existing proposals the board should analyze. Georgetown University Law Center visiting professor Mary McCord agreed with the recently Senate-passed proposal requiring FISA court judges to appoint an amicus curiae in certain cases. The House requested conference on FISA reauthorization (see 2005280023). Davis Polk's Kenneth Wainstein warned against allowing amici to be too involved in court proceedings, saying it could impact national security. He recommended Congress pass the reauthorization and then consider a separate FISA revamp package based on DOJ inspector general findings detailing abuse (see 2003310068).